<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Off you go... into the purple yonder! &#187; Add new tag</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ward.vandewege.net/blog/tag/add-new-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ward.vandewege.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2024 20:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>a new home server</title>
		<link>https://ward.vandewege.net/blog/2009/09/a-new-home-server/</link>
		<comments>https://ward.vandewege.net/blog/2009/09/a-new-home-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 03:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ward]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ward.vandewege.net/blog/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been running an old Shuttle with a 2.4GHz celeron CPU, 512MB of ram and two 500GB disks in raid-1 as home server for the past 5 years or so. Well, I upgraded the disks in May 2007, before that &#8230; <a href="https://ward.vandewege.net/blog/2009/09/a-new-home-server/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running an old Shuttle with a 2.4GHz celeron CPU, 512MB of ram and two 500GB disks in raid-1 as home server for the past 5 years or so. Well, I upgraded the disks in May 2007, before that it had 2x 200GB in raid-1. The thing has no UPS and runs in the closet here at home. And yet:</p>
<pre>
13:40:34 up 569 days, 17:04,  2 users,  load average: 1.26, 0.94, 0.45
</pre>
<p>Yeah, home power is pretty reliable around here.</p>
<p>This machine serves as the central network storage for our home, and I also use it to back up a bunch of servers that live at a nearby colo facility, with the rather fantastic <a href="http://backuppc.sf.net">BackupPC</a>. The Shuttle has served well over the years but it is getting a bit old &#8211; I was starting to expect it to fail. Its power draw is rather high: 78W while idle (that&#8217;s after applying all of powertop&#8217;s suggestions), and a whopping 100W while doing heavy disk activity. </p>
<p>I was running out of disk space again, so I bought two 1TB &#8216;green&#8217; WD drives (WD10EADS-00L) that are rated at 5.4W active, 2.8W idle, and 0.4W standby/sleep.</p>
<p>Next &#8211; a replacement for the Shuttle. First I looked at a <a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=122">QNAP TS-219p</a> which is a rather awesome little NAS device. It&#8217;s based on Marvell&#8217;s Kirkwood ARM core, which is the same as the one used in the <a href="http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp">Sheevaplug</a>, clocked at 1.2GHz. This thing is pretty fast. Its power specs are also impressive: </p>
<pre>
Sleep mode: 5W
In operation: 21W (with 2 x 500GB HDD installed)
</pre>
<p>I was of course looking to <a href="http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-219/">run Debian on it</a>, which is perfectly possible. People like the firmware that the thing comes with, but it&#8217;s proprietary so I&#8217;d rather not use that. Plus, I need to be able to run BackupPC.</p>
<p>The major downside is price &#8211; the TS-219P costs about $400, without disks. Since the Sheevaplug costs about $100, I would have thought a price in the $200-250 range for the TS-219P would have been reasonable.</p>
<p>Meanwhile I came across some really good NAS reviews over at <a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/85/93/">SmallNetBuilder</a>, and in particular their <a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/component/option,com_nas/Itemid,190/task,guide/chart,13/">price/performance NAS chart</a>.</p>
<p>Looking at that chart, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSI_Wind_PC">MSI Wind PC</a> performance is pretty much on par with the TS-219P, for a fraction of the price. Extra bonus: it does not come with proprietary software preinstalled, because the Wind is really a bare-bones PC. The Wind has one 3.5&#8243; bay, and one 5.15&#8243; bay. It also has an on-board CF adapter. It has a dual-core Intel Atom 230 (1.6GHz).</p>
<p>I purchased </p>
<pre>
$134.99    MSI Wind PC
 $26.99    G.SKILL 2GB 200-Pin DDR2 SO-DIMM DDR2 533
 $43.99    Transcend 16GB Compact Flash (CF) Flash Card Model TS16GCF133
  $9.99    StarTech BRACKET Metal 3.5" to 5.25" Drive Adapter Bracket

Total: $215.96 + shipping
</pre>
<p>The drive bay adaptor turned out to be not only severely overpriced, but also not practical for the Wind &#8211; I had to drill a few holes in the damn thing to make the second hard drive fit in the Wind. Don&#8217;t buy this kind, or don&#8217;t pay $10 for it!</p>
<p>I installed Debian on the CF card (leaving it read-only during normal operation) and use the two disks purely for data &#8211; in raid-1 of course. If I did this again I&#8217;d buy a smaller CF card &#8211; 8GB would be plenty, even 4GB would be enough for the non-volatile bits of /.</p>
<p>Power use, as tested: idle 27W, with heavy disk activity 33W. In other words, this will take 50-70W off our household power budget, which should work out to a savings of $7 to $10/month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ward.vandewege.net/blog/2009/09/a-new-home-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
